Home Previous OTMAs OTMA 2011 OTMA 2011 Testimonials

OTMA 2011 Testimonials

 


Three participants have evaluated the OTMA 2011 quantitatively (by giving some scores)

Myriam Amina Derbali


Constantin Toivan

 

 

Peter De Bruyn


 

Quality Control Review Form (2011)

 

Indicate on a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), your score regarding:

 

1) scientific benefits 

3,0

access to related new state of the art work (entire OTM) 

3,6

availability of leading researchers in your field (entire OTM)

4,0

useful feedback by the OTMA staff

4,0

opportunity to acquire new perspectives on your work

3,65

average 

 

2) general skills improvement

4,0

writing (paper, review) 

4,0

presenting (slide show, poster) 

4,0

analytical (review) 

3,8

structuring (all) 

3,95

average 

 

3) social aspects 

4,0

experiencing a constructive-critical attitude 

4,3

sharing ideas and experiences with peers 

4,3

enjoying personalised advice and guidance 

3,0

leading to future career opportunities 

3,9

average 

 

4) organisation 

4,5

professionally organised 

4,1

adequate infrastructure 

3,2

good value for your money 

4,6

a loose and fun atmosphere 

4,1

average 

 

5) overall average score 

3,9

overall average